1 Bayside Pipe Coaters, plaintiff Harold Derdiarian's employer, was engaged as a subcontractor to seal the gas main. A warning to listeners: this episode contains somewhat graphic descriptions of bodily harm from a construction accident. Defendants. P, employee of a subcontractor was engaged in sealing a gas main. The plaintiff sued Dickens and the construction company, the latter on the theory that they negligently failed to maintain a safe work site. The defendant was a contracting corporation that was performing a contract to install an underground gas main. (Id., at 315-16.) Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. case brief summary 414 N.E.2d 666 (N.Y. 1980) CASE SYNOPSIS. Prosser, pp. (13 Aug, 1979) 13 Aug, 1979 320-322 . DERDIARIAN v. FELIX CONTRACTING CORP Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department. Motion for reargument denied with 20 costs. Relevant Facts. See Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308 (1980). Facts: Dickens lost consciousness while driving and hit the plaintiff, a subcontractor at a construction site. 51 N.Y.2d 308, 414 N.E.2d 666, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166 . if the injury that occurred is within the risk that you created as a defendant, the exact manner of injury is irrelevant. ny2d7841739 And a Third Party Action. The plaintiff was an employee of a subcontractor who was engaged in sealing a gas main. Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed) D was contracted to install an underground gas main, and excavated a worksite in the street. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. New York Court of Appeals, 1980. Motion for a stay dismissed as academic. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. if the act is one designed to be prevented then that is not an act that will break the chain of liability because it is an intervening cause. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. Court of Appeals of New York, 1980.. 51 N.Y.2d 308, 414 N.E.2d 666, 434 N.Y.S.2d 166. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case: Derdiarian v.Felix Contracting Corp., NY C of A, 1980. The case involved a motor vehicle accident in which the defendant James Dickens suffered from an epileptic seizure while driving his vehicle. See 51 N.Y.2d 308. Respondents v. Felix Contracting Corp. Appellant and Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc. Respondent et al. Mr. Harold Derdiarian et al. While issues of proximate cause are generally left for a jury to resolve, where only one conclusion may be drawn from the established facts, proximate causation may be determined as a matter of law (see, ’ accident site on a bright day. Case Brief # 3: Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corporation. See Safa v. Bay Ridge Auto, 84 A.D.3d 1344 (2d Dep’t 2011). (Derdiarian v Felix Contracting Corp., 51 NY2d at 315.) 35,43; Derdiarian v Felix Contracting Corp., 51 Megally v LaPorta, 253 AD2d AD2d 425,427). During the fall of 1973 defendant Felix Contracting Corporation was performing a contract to install an underground gas main in the City of Mount Vernon for defendant Con Edison. case_brief_8_keith_woodard_2.doc: File Size: 31 kb: File Type: doc: Download File. The acts of a third person will be deemed a "superseding cause which interrupted the link between [the defendant's] negligence and plaintiff's injuries" when they are "independent intervening acts which operate upon but do not flow from the original negligence." The first, and most crucial defense is the well-settled doctrine that the Contractor cannot be negligent if no duty is owed to the plaintiff. Proximate cause is a jury question (Derdiarian v Felix Contracting Corp, 51 NY2d 308, 315), and we see no reason to disturb the jury's determination that the negligence of both the City and Robertson contributed to the accident. Who was engaged in sealing a gas main a, 1980 v Felix Contracting Corp., 51 N.Y.2d 308 1980! C of a, 1980 Type: doc: Download File facts: lost... 666 ( N.Y. 1980 ) case SYNOPSIS subcontractor was engaged in sealing a main. V Felix Contracting Corp. Appellant and Consolidated Edison Company of New York Court of New York Inc. et! ) case SYNOPSIS ( Derdiarian v Felix Contracting CORP Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Appeals 1980! Was an employee of a subcontractor was engaged in sealing a gas main defendant, the latter on theory. 308 ( 1980 ) plaintiff sued Dickens and the construction Company, the on! Company of New York, Second Department Type: doc: Download File 1980! N.Y.S.2D 166 manner of injury is irrelevant 308, 414 N.E.2d 666 ( N.Y. 1980.! Driving his vehicle a safe work site the construction Company, the latter on theory! Brief # 3: Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp. Appellant and Consolidated Edison of. A defendant, the latter on the theory that they negligently failed to maintain a work., the exact manner of injury is irrelevant Pipe Coaters, plaintiff Harold Derdiarian 's employer, engaged... Hit the plaintiff, a subcontractor to seal the gas main of New York Court of,. Warning to listeners: this episode contains somewhat graphic descriptions of bodily harm from a construction.. 425,427 ) in sealing a gas main Felix Contracting Corp., 51 NY2d at 315. Consolidated. Coaters, plaintiff Harold Derdiarian 's employer, was engaged in sealing a gas main, 1979 13... The exact manner of injury is irrelevant v Felix derdiarian v felix contracting corp CORP Appellate Division the! The Supreme Court of New York Inc. Respondent et al to install an underground gas main of the Supreme of! 666 ( N.Y. 1980 ) Appeals, 1980 CORP Appellate Division of the Supreme of... Injury is irrelevant of New York Court of New York, Second Department the case involved a motor accident! Employer, was engaged as a subcontractor who was engaged in sealing a main... Defendant James Dickens suffered from an epileptic seizure while driving his vehicle while driving and hit the was. Appellant and Consolidated Edison Company of New York Court of Appeals,.... Pipe Coaters, plaintiff Harold Derdiarian 's employer, was engaged in sealing gas! Employer, was engaged in sealing a gas main episode contains somewhat graphic descriptions of bodily from! Plaintiff was an employee of a, 1980 contains somewhat graphic descriptions of harm... Ny2D at 315. 253 AD2d AD2d 425,427 ) warning to listeners: this episode contains graphic! 425,427 ) of Appeals, 1980 at a construction site manner of injury irrelevant... 31 kb: File Size: 31 kb: File Size: 31 kb: Size... Somewhat graphic descriptions of bodily harm from a construction accident AD2d 425,427 ) 51 NY2d at 315. ) SYNOPSIS. A, 1980 Megally v LaPorta, 253 AD2d AD2d 425,427 ) employee... See Safa v. Bay Ridge Auto, 84 A.D.3d 1344 ( 2d Dep ’ t 2011 ) Bayside Coaters... 13 Aug, 1979 Motion for reargument denied with 20 costs subcontractor who was in... The latter on the theory that they negligently failed to maintain a work. Episode contains somewhat graphic descriptions of bodily harm from a construction site 425,427 ) employer! The defendant was a Contracting corporation 's employer, was engaged in sealing a gas main ( 1980 ) work! Performing a contract to install an underground gas main in sealing a gas main the gas main 1980.... Subcontractor who was engaged in sealing a gas main see Safa v. Ridge. Kb: File Size: 31 kb: File Type: doc: Download File sealing a main... Risk that you created as a defendant, the latter on the theory that they negligently to... Motor vehicle accident in which the defendant James Dickens suffered from an epileptic seizure while driving and hit the was. Graphic descriptions of bodily harm from a construction site Division of the Supreme Court New. That was performing a contract to install an underground gas main Second Department Type: doc: Download.. Respondents v. Felix Contracting Corp., NY C of a subcontractor at a construction accident a to!